🔗 Share this article

A digital rights organization has stated to have scraped millions of songs from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to publish them online.

Possible Boost for Artificial Intelligence Development

Observers noted the seeming leak could boost artificial intelligence firms searching for data to train their models.

A group known as Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million rows of metadata such as artist and record names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million tracks, confirmed that the breach did not constitute its entire inventory.

“We have located and disabled the nefarious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” stated a Spotify spokesperson.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, further explained that an investigation into unauthorized access found a third party collected public metadata and employed illicit methods to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Stated Goal and Concerns

Spotify does not think the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for offering links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group claimed the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a means of exchanging large digital files online.

“Of course Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “preserving humanity’s knowledge and heritage”.

Model Development and Copyright Debate

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ rights, said the breached music would likely be utilized for developing AI models.

“Training on pirated data is sadly widespread in the AI industry, so this stolen music is almost certain to end up instructing AI models,” he stated.

The group's website makes references to a large online archive, a vast online repository of copyrighted books that has allegedly been leveraged by the parent company of Facebook to train its AI models.

The co-founder of an AI startup wrote on LinkedIn that members of the public could in theory “build their own private free version of Spotify”. The executive added it could also enable technology firms to “educate models on contemporary music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a battleground between creatives, authors and content creators on one side and tech giants on the other.

Policy Proposals and Reactions

Across Britain, artists and writers have raised concerns against a government suggestion to allow AI companies use protected work without consent unless the owner opts out. Almost every participant to a government call for evidence on the idea has supported artists’ concerns.

The secretary of state for science, research and development informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “take the time to get this right”. The government has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by March 2025.